F-16.net

Printed from: F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference [http://www.f-16.net]
Document title: Low FMC Rate? - F-16.net - The Ultimate F-16 Reference
Original URL: http://www.f-16.net/f-16_forum_viewtopic-t-10579-start-15-sid-6da897c06b9ec05f6915e8330bc25aa4.html
Printed on: 10 October 2008

Forum: F-22A Raptor

Low FMC Rate?



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
em745
PostPosted: Jun 23, 2008 - 03:17 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Enthusiast
Enthusiast


Joined: Oct 18, 2007
Posts: 28

Status: Offline
afnsucks wrote:
And Dozer is one of my more frequent pilots and he is still cheery as ever.

That's good to hear.

I miss his [lengthy] dissertations on Fencecheck. Crying or Very sad Salute

Cool
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Oct 10, 2008 - 8:39 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
Obamanite
PostPosted: Jun 23, 2008 - 03:46 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Senior member
Senior member


Joined: May 26, 2008
Posts: 311

Status: Offline
psychmike wrote:
Obamanite wrote:
Here's a thought: the Raptor has a lot of doors and what not, most notably the weapon bay doors (the gun door and the refueling door and so on), that are DESIGNED to open and close repeatedly - in the course of a mission - without the need to do LO work on the seams every time they open and close (as far as I know there isn't some little LO gnome that comes out of a hidden compartment while the airplane is in flight to apply a coating of LO stuff after the weapon bays open and close). Now, why couldn't they have designed ALL panels to work on the same principle. I get that this is probably, on the face of it, a really stupid question, but it does sort of still make you go hmm...



My understanding is that LM tried to put as many systems as possible which require frequent inspection / service into the weapons and landing gear bays. Other systems which require frequent access also have frequent access panels which can be open and closed without requiring reapplication of stealth coatings. The reason that the aircraft isn't covered in frequent access panels is that they are more expensive to develop and build and heavier compared with standard panels.

Mike


Careful, there, Blu4 may go all medieval on your a$$ Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Not-A-Spy
PostPosted: Jul 18, 2008 - 04:36 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Jul 18, 2008
Posts: 7

Status: Offline
Obamanite wrote:
Here's a thought: the Raptor has a lot of doors and what not, most notably the weapon bay doors (the gun door and the refueling door and so on), that are DESIGNED to open and close repeatedly - in the course of a mission - without the need to do LO work on the seams every time they open and close (as far as I know there isn't some little LO gnome that comes out of a hidden compartment while the airplane is in flight to apply a coating of LO stuff after the weapon bays open and close). Now, why couldn't they have designed ALL panels to work on the same principle. I get that this is probably, on the face of it, a really stupid question, but it does sort of still make you go hmm...


I am that little LO Gnome!! but shhhh

A magician never reveals his tricks.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scorpion1alpha
PostPosted: Jul 19, 2008 - 03:50 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Oct 20, 2005
Posts: 772

Status: Offline
Not-A-Spy wrote:
Obamanite wrote:
Here's a thought: the Raptor has a lot of doors and what not, most notably the weapon bay doors (the gun door and the refueling door and so on), that are DESIGNED to open and close repeatedly - in the course of a mission - without the need to do LO work on the seams every time they open and close (as far as I know there isn't some little LO gnome that comes out of a hidden compartment while the airplane is in flight to apply a coating of LO stuff after the weapon bays open and close). Now, why couldn't they have designed ALL panels to work on the same principle. I get that this is probably, on the face of it, a really stupid question, but it does sort of still make you go hmm...


I am that little LO Gnome!! but shhhh

A magician never reveals his tricks.


If you're that magician, I couldn't agree more.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel