| Author |
Message |
|
Yoram777
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2008 - 01:15 AM
|
|
|
Regular User

Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Posts: 22
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Aug 28, 2008 - 1:38 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
Last edited by Yoram777 on Aug 25, 2008 - 05:38 PM; edited 2 times in total
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ArrowHawk
|
Posted: Aug 24, 2008 - 06:23 AM
|
|
|
Regular User

Joined: Aug 20, 2004
Posts: 26
Status: Offline
|
Nice videos!  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yoram777
|
Posted: Aug 25, 2008 - 05:14 AM
|
|
|
Regular User

Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Posts: 22
Status: Offline
|
btw why is it BF-01 and not BF-1 like with the AA-1  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LinkF16SimDude
|
Posted: Aug 27, 2008 - 12:40 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Aug 31, 2004
Posts: 1490
Status: Offline
|
| It's got a fuel dump. Never knew that. |
_________________ Why does "monosyllabic" have 5 syllables?
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LMAggie
|
Posted: Aug 27, 2008 - 03:31 PM
|
|
|
Veteran

Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 286
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
|
Yoram777 wrote:
btw why is it BF-01 and not BF-1 like with the AA-1
It is BF-1. |
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yoram777
|
Posted: Aug 27, 2008 - 03:41 PM
|
|
|
Regular User

Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Posts: 22
Status: Offline
|
|
LMAggie wrote:
It is BF-1.
Then why does it say BF-01 on the tails?, you can see it in the ground testing video I posted. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
dwightlooi
|
Posted: Aug 27, 2008 - 06:47 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Aug 02, 2006
Posts: 940
Status: Offline
|
|
Yoram777 wrote:
LMAggie wrote:
It is BF-1.
Then why does it say BF-01 on the tails?, you can see it in the ground testing video I posted.
Because 01 = 1 numerically? Because they mean the same thing and someone may have thought that 01 looks better with the graphics that 1? I think you are dwelling into one detail which the guys who authorized the tail's artwork didn't even think twice about. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LMAggie
|
Posted: Aug 27, 2008 - 08:38 PM
|
|
|
Veteran

Joined: Aug 12, 2007
Posts: 286
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Status: Offline
|
|
Yoram777 wrote:
LMAggie wrote:
It is BF-1.
Then why does it say BF-01 on the tails?, you can see it in the ground testing video I posted.
I didn't notice that. Well, technically it is BF-0001, but I've always seen it written as BF-1. |
_________________ “Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lightndattic
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2008 - 03:47 PM
|
|
|
Active member

Joined: Aug 06, 2005
Posts: 203
Status: Offline
|
|
LinkF16SimDude wrote:
It's got a fuel dump. Never knew that.
Naval aircraft need it in case they have an emergency right after launch and need to dump fuel to get down to landing weight and get back on deck quickly. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Guysmiley
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2008 - 04:55 PM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Aug 26, 2005
Posts: 1091
|
|
Lightndattic wrote:
LinkF16SimDude wrote:
It's got a fuel dump. Never knew that.
Naval aircraft need it in case they have an emergency right after launch and need to dump fuel to get down to landing weight and get back on deck quickly.
I'm assuming that the fuel dump puts out significantly more pounds per minute that just running in MAX AB? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Yoram777
|
Posted: Aug 04, 2008 - 11:10 PM
|
|
|
Regular User

Joined: Aug 23, 2007
Posts: 22
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
VarkVet
|
Posted: Aug 05, 2008 - 03:18 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Aug 30, 2006
Posts: 625
Status: Offline
|
Very nice video.
I wonder if you can light Burner with the nozzle all the way down  |
_________________ My eyes have seen the glory of the Lord and the esthetics of the Flightline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
That_Engine_Guy
|
Posted: Aug 05, 2008 - 05:52 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Aug 14, 2005
Posts: 683
Status: Offline
|
|
VarkVet wrote:
I wonder if you can light Burner with the nozzle all the way down
I don't think so, too much back-pressure making that 90* bend.
Not to mention the spray/flame would definitely burn-through making a turn! |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
asiatrails
|
Posted: Aug 05, 2008 - 06:33 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Aug 30, 2005
Posts: 649
Status: Offline
|
|
VarkVet wrote:
Very nice video.
I wonder if you can light Burner with the nozzle all the way down
No, nozzle down operation needs to keep the center of thrust and the center of gravity really close to each other.
On the Harrier and the VAK-191 the allowable variation between the two was about 2 inches. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Elliboom
|
Posted: Aug 05, 2008 - 05:06 PM
|
|
|
Active member

Joined: Aug 05, 2006
Posts: 228
Status: Offline
|
|
Lightndattic wrote:
LinkF16SimDude wrote:
It's got a fuel dump. Never knew that.
Naval aircraft need it in case they have an emergency right after launch and need to dump fuel to get down to landing weight and get back on deck quickly.
As far as I know pretty much all large aircraft have fuel dump capabilty, I know when we dump we can pretty much get rid of fuel at a rate close to 10 thousand pounds per minute. I makes a really pretty contrail also. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|