| Author |
Message |
|
ariesrising
|
Posted: Feb 03, 2004 - 03:33 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Feb 03, 2004
Posts: 3
Status: Offline
|
Is it possible for an F-16 in a SEAD mission to be outfitted with both HARMs and Mavericks?
In a SEAD mission, which is the most likely weapons load to include Maverick's and is it all that common to see Maverick's used for SEAD missions? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Sep 07, 2008 - 11:02 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Habu
|
Posted: Feb 03, 2004 - 03:36 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Oct 21, 2003
Posts: 2363
Status: Offline
|
I've seen pics of that loadout, yes.
Definitely possible. |
_________________ Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
ariesrising
|
Posted: Feb 03, 2004 - 04:02 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Feb 03, 2004
Posts: 3
Status: Offline
|
| Is it possible with external tanks under the wings? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Habu
|
Posted: Feb 03, 2004 - 06:00 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Oct 21, 2003
Posts: 2363
Status: Offline
|
Here's a pic of the Hasegawa 1/48 scale TigerMeet CJ kit box top....
That's from h2's site. But anyway, you can clearly see a Maverick one side, and a HARM on the other. |
_________________ Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Loader
|
Posted: Feb 03, 2004 - 01:58 PM
|
|
|
Veteran

Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 268
Status: Offline
|
There are a varity of munition combinations authorized. What is loaded really depends the target set, number of aircraft in the flight, and over all mission goal.
I have loaded both a HARM and MAV on the same jet, and yes it had 370s, just like the above photo.
Don't forget JDAMS.
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/smart/jdam.htm |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Feb 03, 2004 - 03:42 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2832
|
| JDAM can also engage from a longer range and higher altitude. You go after Air Defense assets with Maverick, don't be suprised if you get engaged with AAA. LGBs have been used for SEAD/DEAD missions also. The goal when possible is: "I can touch you, but you can't touch me." Many of the juicy methods of how the sensors, HARM, JDAM, LGBs and the trained SEAD/DEAD team all work together is classified. If a sensor can rapidly hand me a location and it is a fixed target and I have a JDAM, that target dead in any weather. |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Loader
|
Posted: Feb 03, 2004 - 08:48 PM
|
|
|
Veteran

Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 268
Status: Offline
|
|
elp wrote:
The goal when possible is: "I can touch you, but you can't touch me." Many of the juicy methods of how the sensors, HARM, JDAM, LGBs and the trained SEAD/DEAD team all work together is classified.
Well said elp. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Habu
|
Posted: Feb 06, 2004 - 03:00 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Oct 21, 2003
Posts: 2363
Status: Offline
|
|
Loader wrote:
have loaded both a HARM and MAV on the same jet, and yes it had 370s, just like the above photo.
OK, now you can only load one Mav, right? You can't stick a TER full of em on Sta.3 or 7 can you? With a HARM on the other side, of course. |
_________________ Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Gums
|
Posted: Feb 06, 2004 - 04:06 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Dec 16, 2003
Posts: 798
Status: Offline
|
Good question, Habu-breath.
The electrical interface for the Maverick is a bear. A few dozen discrete and analog wires, plus the video.
So my guess is one per station.
The HARM is a different breed of cat ( many signals and stuff required for it to track and home on the threat), but I would still guess one per station.
JDAM? If the higher HQ has a super way of providing coordinates to the Viper, then it would work well in SEAD role. Somehow, I don't think so...... I would prefer the onboard detection/targeting of the Weasel Vipers and HARMS.
The IIR Maverick is awesome, but I don't think it is tactically the best SEAD weapon. IMHO.
I ain't gonna give out all the good poop and tactics on this BB so all the bad guys can develop effective countermeasures.
Let me just say that WE are the ones who will hunt down and destroy the bad guys. If they can come up with a way to hinder us, then that will just make the fight more interesting................ |
_________________ Gums
Viper pilot '79
"God in your guts, good men at your back, wings that stay on - and Tally Ho!"
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Feb 06, 2004 - 06:30 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2832
|
OK one and only one juicy secret. A thingy goes off in the cockpit and the pilot says: "I'm mad! I'm gonna get that gomer".
Please don't blab that around. It's secret. And it works.  |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Feb 06, 2004 - 07:02 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
|
| 3x Mavericks on LAU-88s on STA # & 7 is a valid load for AGM-65As, Bs and Ds, but not Gs. The Gs can only be carried in singles on LAU-117s. Not sure why, but that's what's listed in the stores lists. |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Habu
|
Posted: Feb 06, 2004 - 08:36 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Oct 21, 2003
Posts: 2363
Status: Offline
|
But I've seen Iron Eagle, I KNOW it can hold 3 Mavs on a TER, and fire off 12 of them, and while on the ground too!  |
_________________ Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Loader
|
Posted: Feb 06, 2004 - 02:32 PM
|
|
|
Veteran

Joined: Jun 16, 2003
Posts: 268
Status: Offline
|
Too funny Habu!
Yep, when I did a mixed load of Mav and HARM, only one each. From my experience, you will not see the USAF use the LAU-88 for anything. Too much drag, and as previoulsy posted, the newest MAVs are not compatible with the LAU-88. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Habu
|
Posted: Feb 06, 2004 - 06:21 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Moderator

Joined: Oct 21, 2003
Posts: 2363
Status: Offline
|
Yeah, that's what I figured. Besides, it even looks better that way. Three Mavs on there would look too bulky, leave that for the A-10  |
_________________ Do your homework, Tiger!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
EriktheF16462
|
Posted: Mar 28, 2004 - 04:39 AM
|
|
|
Elite

Joined: Mar 19, 2004
Posts: 540
Status: Offline
|
The real deal. Mav Gs only go on certain versions of the LAU117 and some LAU88s can carry them but the drag index is so high and pilots don't like to take a second look at any target that it is a useless load. So one MAV.
Habu, you can shoot that MAV on the ground, no problem, if you know the right switch positions. Now where is that, ground jet enable? But it can't be reloaded inflight or carry 12 missiles. BTW these days the word MISSile should be changed to HITtile. Our stuff works. |
_________________ F16 462 AD USAF. Crew dog for 3 and Even a pointy head for a few months.
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|