Forum: F-16 versus XYZ

F-16 block 50/52+ RCS vs Super Hornet RCS



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
geogen
PostPosted: Apr 28, 2008 - 01:25 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Posts: 260
Location: 45km @ sea... New England
Status: Offline
1) Just curious which has better LO... And if follow-on upgrades give potential on either model to be further reduced RCS, more than the other?

2) Also, what has better overall counter-measures... the best Viper package option, or the best CM package for SH? Thanks!

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jul 09, 2008 - 1:45 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 28, 2008 - 03:59 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 634

Status: Offline
They're both "good-guy" jets.... Why would it matter?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Apr 28, 2008 - 04:22 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Posts: 260
Location: 45km @ sea... New England
Status: Offline
I guess maybe bragging rights Smile And maybe for sales potential based on both of those specs?

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
sprstdlyscottsmn
PostPosted: Apr 28, 2008 - 01:57 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 338

Status: Offline
Well given that in the Blk 50/52+ Vipers it is almost an afterthought, and the F/A-18E/F/G was a new build with reduced RCS in mind, and that the Super hornet is a much larger airframe (more room for ECM), would have to say the Super Hornet takes the cake.

_________________
James,

-Pilot
-Aerospace Engineer
-Army Medic (WTF?)
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Roscoe
PostPosted: Apr 30, 2008 - 05:04 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Jun 29, 2004
Posts: 953
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
Anyone who really knows, knows better than to answer. Anyone who answers, is guessing.

_________________
Roscoe

<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Apr 30, 2008 - 06:40 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Veteran
Veteran


Joined: Mar 11, 2008
Posts: 260
Location: 45km @ sea... New England
Status: Offline
LOL Roscoe, well I didn't think it was really a top-secret issue. And I asked it out of raw, academic interest. So yes, I'm just inquiring about rough estimated guesses as to what has lower RCS principles between latest F-16 blocks or Super Hornet and which has better CM... no prob.

I would think forinstance that discussions in past have concluded F-22 to be more LO than F-35, yet one could guess F-35 to have better CM?

Given India's MMRCA contest, it would presumably play into that as well. That is one serious fighter competition, between the F-16IN and F-18IN alone!

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel