Forum: F-16 Design & Construction

Variant lengths



Search Search  Register Register  Log in to check your private messages Log in to check your private messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
xenon333
PostPosted: Apr 01, 2008 - 03:57 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 30, 2008
Posts: 18

Status: Offline
Does the block 52+ variant differ in length compared to the first few blocks (15/25/30)? According to the versions section here, the length does not change. However, after looking the specs for 52+ from other websites, I noticed that the lengths weren't the exact same.

Are the different websites measuring from different points on the aircraft or are the f-16.net specs inaccurate, meaning that maybe 52+ really is longer?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: Jul 06, 2008 - 1:19 AM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor






This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member.
   
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 12:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 624

Status: Offline
Are you noticing the engine length?

The PW engine nozzle is longer than the GE. You can see in most photos that the GE nozzle does not extend past the horizontal stabs, where the PW nozzle does.

So; PW Blocks 5-25, 32, 42, 52, 52+ will have a longer nozzle than the GE Blocks 30, 40, 50 or 60. This will make the jet look longer even though it isn't. The tip of the vertical tail still extends past both PW/GE nozzles, so from pitot tube to the tip tail, the length is almost the same for all. Wink

Hope it helps...

Keep 'em flyin'
TEG Thumb



untitled2.jpg
 Description:
Top PW engine with Chute
Middle PW engine
Bottom GE engine
 Filesize:  37.21 KB
 Viewed:  776 Time(s)

untitled2.jpg


 View user's profile Send private message  
 
maddog2840
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 12:12 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Mar 26, 2004
Posts: 656
Location: Las Vegas NV
Status: Offline
I hear a bar bet coming. Good info. Nice trivia.

_________________
Vipers Fight while Raptors Train.
 View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website  
 
xenon333
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 01:53 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 30, 2008
Posts: 18

Status: Offline
Thanks, that helps a lot.

I still have one small question though. You said the length from the vertical tail tip to the pitot tube is "almost" the same for all variants. Any idea how much shorter or longer an F-16 C from blks 5 to 52 can get?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 02:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 624

Status: Offline
I don't think much of anything. Maybe a few inches?

The basic design hasn't changed, and GD/LM hasn't changed the basic design for the structure other than making it stronger. Stronger tends to add weight, but not much length.

Even the engines have stayed almost identical over the years as far as dimensions; besides weight... (Due to durability/reliability enhancements)

Then again most of us tend to get a bit heaver with maturity, but gain reliability as well Wink

Keep 'em flyin' Thumb
TEG
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
xenon333
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 02:37 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 30, 2008
Posts: 18

Status: Offline
That really clears things up. Thanks for the help, fatty. Razz
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 03:09 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 624

Status: Offline
xenon333 wrote:
That really clears things up. Thanks for the help, fatty. Razz


Big No No Is a Block 52 fatter than a Block 5? Or more mature, capable, and durable?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
xenon333
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 03:26 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 30, 2008
Posts: 18

Status: Offline
Block 52 is more mature, capable, and durable, but it's also a lot fatter. I guess you can't have one without the other. Razz
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
vegasdave901
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 04:02 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Frequent Poster
Frequent Poster


Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Posts: 55

Status: Offline
If your going pitot to back of tail as if a plumb line was dropped from top back tip of tail wouldn't they all be the same length? and is that the official length or do they go from pitot to back of engine? A good bar bet would be pitot to back of engine because when you go out to measure you can dilate or contract the nozzle a few inches to fit your side of the bet!
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
xenon333
PostPosted: Apr 02, 2008 - 04:23 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: Mar 30, 2008
Posts: 18

Status: Offline
Apparently they're not all the exact same length. I think what TEG was trying to say is that the distance from the pitot to the vertical tail tip might be a couple inches smaller or larger depending on the block number of the C/D variant.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 27, 2008 - 04:55 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 624

Status: Offline
vegasdave901 wrote:
A good bar bet would be pitot to back of engine because when you go out to measure you can dilate or contract the nozzle a few inches to fit your side of the bet!


True; Depending on the position of the nozzle (open/closed) the nozzle length of both engine types does change.

Another factor is engine temperature. A hot engine is longer than a cold one. Ever wonder why the front mount of the engine is a roller in a track? When you look closely at hardware in the turbines, and augmentor sections, the expansion factor is very evident in the overall design.

xenon333 wrote:
Apparently they're not all the exact same length. I think what TEG was trying to say is that the distance from the pitot to the vertical tail tip might be a couple inches smaller or larger depending on the block number of the C/D variant.


Yes; that is what I was getting at.

Keep 'em flyin' Thumb
TEG
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
TimmayMan
PostPosted: Apr 27, 2008 - 12:19 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active member
Active member


Joined: Apr 27, 2007
Posts: 127

Status: Offline
I think there is a slight height difference between the blk 32s and older versus the blk 40s and newer due to the landing gear. I'd say around 4-6 inches or so. I can't remember height requirement at the rear for pulling a motor on the 30s but I do know that you don't require a jack under the nose like you do on the 40s and newer although that may have more to do with weight.

_________________
Nellis 01-03 Phase Nonner
Aviano03-05 555th 89-2038
Cannon05-07 523rd 88-0150
Osan 07-present 36th 90-0771
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
That_Engine_Guy
PostPosted: Apr 27, 2008 - 05:28 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite
Elite


Joined: Dec 14, 2005
Posts: 624

Status: Offline
TimmayMan wrote:
I think there is a slight height difference between the blk 32s and older versus the blk 40s and newer due to the landing gear. I'd say around 4-6 inches or so. I can't remember height requirement at the rear for pulling a motor on the 30s but I do know that you don't require a jack under the nose like you do on the 40s and newer although that may have more to do with weight.


Correct, but more with height than weight.

The stance of the gear is higher, but the engine R&I (Removal & Installation) trailer still has extension limits. By jacking the nose up, it lowers the engine to the reach of the R&I trailer.

The amount of gear installed on the aircraft can greatly affect this as well. No canopy, no seat, no gun, and you're pretty much screwed if you want to remove the engine. Not enough weight. Jacking the nose won't cause the jet to pivot, it only causes lift on the nose. Lack of planning means the engine has stays put until the jet comes back together more.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2008 Lieven Dewitte and Stefaan Vanhastel