Forum: F-35 Lightning II

Northrop Grumman Begins Assembling First F-35 Production Jet



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   Previous  1, 2
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
LMAggie
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2008 - 07:18 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 12, 2007 - 08:43 AM
Posts: 573

Status: Offline
SpudmanWP wrote:
LMAggie wrote:
SpudmanWP wrote:
LMAggie wrote:
dwightlooi wrote:
Interesting Note: The first weight optimized CTOL will be the AF-6 not AF-1.


Says who?


um..... you did read the press release, right?


It says "...first production Lightning II jet, a weight-optimized..." Its the first production jet, but not the first weight optimized. AF-1 will break that ground.


From the first post
Quote:
Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) has begun assembling the center fuselage for the first production Lightning II jet, a weight-optimized, U.S. Air Force F-35A conventional take-off and landing (CTOL) variant designated AF-6.


In the very first sentence it says it all. How are you missing that?


It says its "a weight optimized" not "the first weight optimized". The first is refering to the first production article. If there is a big difference between AF-1 and AF-6 besides avionics, then my manager forgot to send that memo to me. lol

_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 26, 2012 - 12:54 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2008 - 07:55 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 3321
Location: California
Status: Offline
I see your point as the first weight optimized airframe is still a testbed aircraft.

I think dwightlooi might have meant that he was surprised that the naming of the production airframes did not start with AF-1 instead of continuing with the AA-x naming convention.

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LMAggie
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2008 - 08:32 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 12, 2007 - 08:43 AM
Posts: 573

Status: Offline
Ya its confusing. Im curious as to where "AA" came from, because "AF" and "AG" are pretty logical.

_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
SpudmanWP
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2008 - 08:54 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 3K
Elite 3K


Joined: Oct 12, 2006 - 08:18 PM
Posts: 3321
Location: California
Status: Offline
btw, two thumbs up on the BF-1 rollout Smile

Looking forward to it's first flight.

_________________
"The early bird gets the worm but the second mouse gets the cheese."
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LMAggie
PostPosted: Apr 07, 2008 - 09:07 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 12, 2007 - 08:43 AM
Posts: 573

Status: Offline
SpudmanWP wrote:
btw, two thumbs up on the BF-1 rollout Smile

Looking forward to it's first flight.


It'll fly before you know it!

_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
checksixx
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2008 - 01:46 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 20, 2005 - 05:28 AM
Posts: 1179

Status: Offline
Where do we send the beer for more pics of BF-1?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2008 - 01:49 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1831

Status: Offline
geogen wrote:
Corsair1963 wrote:
I love this talk like the F-35 is on verge of failure or cancelation..........Really, the Lightning is in a position to take a share of the export market like no fighter has before it! Just think the thousands of aircraft in need of replacement........F-4's, F-15's, F-16's, F/A-18's, AV-8's, A-10's, Mirage 2000's, Mig-29's, Tornado's, etc. etc. etc. Personally, I would love for anyone to tell me what design is going to take any of these sales away from the F-35? Wink


Corsair, besides the obvious F-35 being deployed operationally overseas around 2015-16(?) as is widely anticipated, the 'thousands' needing replacement will be and ARE also being replaced by F-18 Superhornets, Typhoons, F-15 advance mods, F-16 advance blocks, Rafale, Gripen (and advance 2010 Gripen) and perhaps Russian make Mig/Su. Just to answer your 'wink' Very Happy Major business deals going down out there today (and tomorrow) .



You are hardly making a case? While, the Super Hornet did replace the F-14 Tomcat and A-6 Intruder in USN Service. Its only export order thus far is for 24 aircraft for the RAAF. As a matter of fact in both cases (i.e. USN & RAAF) it was only selected as stop gap until the arrival of the F-35! On the otherhand both F-15 and F-16 production lines are nearing the end. While more advance 4.5 Generation Types like the Typhoon and Rafale have had little or no success at all.............As for the Russians they usually sell to non-Western Customers. (with a few exceptions and in small numbers) Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
LMAggie
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2008 - 03:43 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Aug 12, 2007 - 08:43 AM
Posts: 573

Status: Offline
checksixx wrote:
Where do we send the beer for more pics of BF-1?


Well, I dont have any pics but you can always send me beer.

_________________
“Its not the critic who counts..The credit belongs to the man who does actually strive to do the deeds..”
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
geogen
PostPosted: Apr 08, 2008 - 11:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 2K
Elite 2K


Joined: Mar 11, 2008 - 03:28 PM
Posts: 2498
Location: 45 km offshore, New England
Status: Offline
It's hard to say corsair. But I'm just sticking to the current affairs vis-a-vis the hundreds of recent, current and near-future tactical aircraft which could very well be replaced with other competitive modern versions such as the ones I listed. Take Norway, Denmark and Nederlands, e.g. Can you assume they are going to wait until 2016 and even then assume they are going to buy F-35? You really can't say with certainty. Look at the Gulf states too.. very modern alternatives being scooped up. India needs to replace Mig-21 but this is a valid example of what is being sought today. Maybe Superhornet will be the answer, who knows. Brazil is rumored to be looking at SH too. Why not - with latest avionics/radar/counter-measures/weapons, it's formidable. Moreover, it's very hard to say what plan Japan will arrive at, but of course one can't discount F-35.

Not saying that numerous potential buyers will never, eventually, augment their tactical mix with some F-35s, but it's really so far off and the costs are unknown, to really assume anything firm.

_________________
The Super-Viper has not yet begun to concede.
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  
 
Corsair1963
PostPosted: Apr 09, 2008 - 05:48 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Dec 19, 2005 - 04:14 AM
Posts: 1831

Status: Offline
geogen wrote:
It's hard to say corsair. But I'm just sticking to the current affairs vis-a-vis the hundreds of recent, current and near-future tactical aircraft which could very well be replaced with other competitive modern versions such as the ones I listed. Take Norway, Denmark and Nederlands, e.g. Can you assume they are going to wait until 2016 and even then assume they are going to buy F-35? You really can't say with certainty. Look at the Gulf states too.. very modern alternatives being scooped up. India needs to replace Mig-21 but this is a valid example of what is being sought today. Maybe Superhornet will be the answer, who knows. Brazil is rumored to be looking at SH too. Why not - with latest avionics/radar/counter-measures/weapons, it's formidable. Moreover, it's very hard to say what plan Japan will arrive at, but of course one can't discount F-35.

Not saying that numerous potential buyers will never, eventually, augment their tactical mix with some F-35s, but it's really so far off and the costs are unknown, to really assume anything firm.


Personally, I don't see the Netherlands, Norway, or Denmark leaving the JSF Program. Nor, do I see countries like Japan or Israel selecting something other than the F-35..................Really, except for India's forthcoming MMRCA or a possible small order from a third world country. The Lightning will very likely dominate the market for the forseeable future. Of course I am not including countries that don't or can't buy a Wetern Type and are forced to purchase aircraft from Russia or China. (Syria or Iran for example) Wink
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Copyright © 2012 F-16.net