| Author |
Message |
|
Racer181
|
Posted: Feb 19, 2008 - 08:11 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 168
Status: Offline
|
I've only worked block 30's so can somebody explain the purpose of the WAR HUD (That's the one with the two combiner glass' right???) in the block 40? why is it oversized and why are there two combiner glass'.
Since we're talkin about avionics, I don't wanna hear someone's breakin OPSEC this and that, if you feel there is an OPSEC issuse don't post, or notify a mod to have the post magically disapear.
Thanks |
_________________ Putting warheads on foreheads
SrA Joe
Former ACC 86-0258
181st Intel Wing "Racers"
Base Honor Guard
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Oct 13, 2008 - 11:34 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Vader7043
|
Posted: Feb 19, 2008 - 02:32 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 31, 2006
Posts: 23
Status: Offline
|
Hello Racer,
The purpose of the over sized combiner glass on the Block 40 was to accommodate the video from the LANTIRN package, specifically the NAV pod. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
C-Bass06
|
Posted: Feb 19, 2008 - 03:19 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Nov 14, 2005
Posts: 56
Location: Ohio
Status: Offline
|
| You might like this picture...I also think there's more about it on this site if you look under LANTIRN |
| Description: |
|
| Filesize: |
135.51 KB |
| Viewed: |
1894 Time(s) |

|
_________________ "Their lives are our business"
SrA Andrew, 112th FS
Aircrew Life Support
2006- Present
|
|
|
|
 |
|
SixerViper
|
Posted: Feb 19, 2008 - 05:12 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Jun 05, 2007
Posts: 349
Status: Offline
|
I thought that the block 30's hud raster display could also display LANTIRN/Litening/Sniper video. Am I wrong?
Perhaps the WAR HUD was needed at the time the 40s were built and the WAC people didn't get their raster video capability until several SCUs down the road. |
_________________ F-106A/B '69-'73
F-105D/F '73-'81
A-7D/K '81-'91
F-16C/D '91-'05
SCUBA bum '05-Present
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Racker2
|
Posted: Feb 20, 2008 - 12:55 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: May 22, 2007
Posts: 36
Location: Sheppard
Status: Offline
|
Racer,
The WAR (wide angle reflective) HUD you are talking about was used for the NAVPOD as previously mentioned by Vader. It has a broader FOV which made it ideal for NAVPOD video, as depicted by the picture. The WAC (wide angle conventional) on the pre-block 40 AC is capable of displaying video from the NVP as well (as Sixer stated) but not with the same FOV as the WAR hud. I might be mistaken, but I don't think to many units out there fly the conventional NAV POD. I know when I was in the ROK the last time we got rid of them because the pilots didn't like to fly with them...it increased their drag coefficient. |
_________________ Luke
Osan
Mnt Home
Sheppard
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Racer181
|
Posted: Feb 20, 2008 - 06:47 AM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Mar 07, 2005
Posts: 168
Status: Offline
|
| Cool thanks I think that pretty much answers my question. |
_________________ Putting warheads on foreheads
SrA Joe
Former ACC 86-0258
181st Intel Wing "Racers"
Base Honor Guard
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Roscoe
|
Posted: Feb 23, 2008 - 06:27 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jun 29, 2004
Posts: 972
Status: Offline
|
| Actually, WAR stands for Wide Angle Raster, not reflective. |
_________________ Roscoe
<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
|
|
|
|
 |
|
F16VIPER
|
Posted: Feb 23, 2008 - 07:03 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 23, 2003
Posts: 287
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
LAVI
|
Posted: Mar 15, 2008 - 11:52 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Jul 12, 2003
Posts: 18
Status: Offline
|
| What can be openly discussed about the Block 50 HUD? Are the capabilities of the new HUD's better or just different? Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Obi_Offiah
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2008 - 08:04 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Mar 27, 2004
Posts: 115
Status: Offline
|
One of the main advantages of the WAR hud is that it has a large Instantaneous FOV, something like 30 x 18 degrees. This is much greater than the IFOV of the WAC HUD.
Obi |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2008 - 08:12 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1198
Status: Offline
|
|
LAVI wrote:
What can be openly discussed about the Block 50 HUD? Are the capabilities of the new HUD's better or just different? Thanks
Different, and I can't say they are better..........they are really about the same. Only real difference is the software loaded into them.
Purple |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sp4
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2008 - 08:35 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Oct 03, 2007
Posts: 8
|
| The Block 50 HUD PDU is the same as the Block 30 and is not software driven. The program is kept either in the EU or ADS Card depending on block and whether or not CCIP is cw. In my opinion the WAR HUD is better because it has a nice resting place for the JG when you climb in and out of the cockpit. |
_________________ V/r,
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Purplehaze
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2008 - 08:57 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 1198
Status: Offline
|
| Okay....sorry you are correct....it's in the EU...but the HUD is really no better......don't you agree? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sp4
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2008 - 09:23 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Oct 03, 2007
Posts: 8
|
| I agree with ya purple haze. Now that the NVP is obsolete they provide the same function, just minor display window size differences. |
_________________ V/r,
|
|
|
|
 |
|
habu2
|
Posted: Mar 27, 2008 - 11:06 PM
|
|
|
Elite 2K

Joined: Sep 05, 2003
Posts: 2804
Location: ACES II
Status: Offline
|
|
Obi_Offiah wrote:
One of the main advantages of the WAR hud is that it has a large Instantaneous FOV, something like 30 x 18 degrees. This is much greater than the IFOV of the WAC HUD.
Obi
Conventional A/B HUD is 13.5x9 IFOV, 20x20 TFOV
WAC HUD is 20x15 IFOV, 25x25 TFOV
WAR HUD is 30x17 IFOV, 20x30 TFOV |
_________________ Reality Is For People Who Can't Handle Simulation
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|