| Author |
Message |
|
rhertzCAP
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 05:44 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Posts: 11
Status: Offline
|
| How does everyone here feel about the F-22A starting to replace the F-16? open for discussion |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Oct 07, 2008 - 6:22 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
HazF16
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 04:04 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 24, 2005
Posts: 345
Location: anytime, anywhere
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Pyth_4
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 04:10 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 27, 2005
Posts: 20
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
|
F-16 and F-22 are not the same!
F-16A was made as a light weight fighter, an standard plane. However, F-22 is... is amazing. The F-22 was made to be the best air dominance fighter, actually F-16 wasn't designed to be a half of that in its time.
Regards. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Muscles10
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 04:25 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 10, 2006
Posts: 20
Location: Aviano
Status: Offline
|
| What kind of question is this? The F-22 is supposed to replace the F-15 and the F-35 is made to replace the F-16. Nothing can truly replace the F-16, though. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
rhertzCAP
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 04:46 PM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Apr 06, 2006
Posts: 11
Status: Offline
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Lamecrap
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 04:55 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Feb 14, 2006
Posts: 25
Status: Offline
|
| I think the real issue is, will the F-22 and F-35 be able to replace it? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Guysmiley
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 05:21 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: May 26, 2005
Posts: 1120
|
|
Lamecrap wrote:
I think the real issue is, will the F-22 and F-35 be able to replace it?
First you have to answer "How much are you willing to spend?" |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MICAP
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 05:33 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 27
Status: Offline
|
| I can tell some people here ara a little slow, thanks rhertzCAP for the link. I think it's great to have the guard -16s evolve into a -22 squadron. This relieves some of the flying burden from the 27th when both the 27th and 94th are at their 18 PAA each. There will not be the abundance of -22 pilots as the other bases come online. Also, it allows the ANG to get some well deserved recognition. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MICAP
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 05:34 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Dec 21, 2005
Posts: 27
Status: Offline
|
| This isn't a money issue as much as it is a ANG vs. Active Duty flying in support of each other and supporting each others' missions both here and, when time comes, abroad. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
HazF16
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 05:46 PM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 24, 2005
Posts: 345
Location: anytime, anywhere
Status: Offline
|
| well, it doesnt actually replace the viper. the VA ANG is just switching to the raptor. it's a usual thing for ANG units to switch their airframes every now and then. sometimes they even switch from fighter to cargo jets or something.. so u cant say the raptor replaced the viper. it's just that unit that switched airframes. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
swanee
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 06:23 PM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Posts: 531
Status: Offline
|
| It's key to note that the 192nd is going to share iron with the 1st. I am sure the 192 is going to want an airplane with their tail flash on it. I know the reserve units have multiple squadron markings on their airplanes in the instances that a reserve unit shares iron with an active duty squadron. |
_________________ Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
FDiron
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 10:29 PM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Apr 28, 2005
Posts: 88
Status: Offline
|
The Air Force is undergoing a major change. Air to air roles are being taken over by the F-22, while air to ground roles are being split between the F-35 and multiple types of UAVs.
The F-16 is in the same spot right now as the P-51 was in the Korean War. Its not the highest performance aircraft out there anymore, but its extremely usefull. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Apr 06, 2006 - 11:39 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1033
Status: Offline
|
Probably won't get a bird with their tail flash on it. The whole F-16 unit from Richmond will eventually move to and absorb into the 1 FW.
-Check |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
swanee
|
Posted: Apr 07, 2006 - 01:54 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jan 25, 2005
Posts: 531
Status: Offline
|
|
checksixx wrote:
Probably won't get a bird with their tail flash on it. The whole F-16 unit from Richmond will eventually move to and absorb into the 1 FW.
-Check
Yeah, it's actually funny that alot of the guys who fly with that unit have lived in Hampton Roads because the schools are better. Their commute is going to go from about 45-60 minutes to about 15.. |
_________________ Life is too short for ugly sailboats, fat women and bad beer!
|
|
|
|
 |
|
elp
|
Posted: Apr 07, 2006 - 02:20 PM
|
|
|
F-16.net Editor

Joined: Sep 23, 2003
Posts: 2847
|
We have seen Guard units have F-16s replaced with KC-135s. That doesn't mean that the KC-135 will do the same type of missions done by the F-16.  |
_________________ - ELP -
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|