Forum: F-16 Design & Construction

F-16C FY83 - why not retired yet?



Search Search  Register Register  Private Messages Private Messages
guidelines Forum Guidelines
Post new topic   Reply to topic   
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic
Author Message
Boman
PostPosted: Mar 09, 2008 - 11:49 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
Just curious;
As there are at least 5 FY84 F-16C retired to AMARC, one should think that the FY83 Charlie's where also there. But besides some acting as GF-16C's at Sheppard, all are still operational (Minus those who has crashed off course Wink )

Anyone who can explain this to me, as logic dictates that FY83 should wind up in AMARC before FY84. Or.......?

(PS! I know that BRAC will make sure that most end up in AMARC within the year, but still.......)

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Sponsor
New postPosted: May 24, 2013 - 6:31 PM Back to top
F-16.net Sponsor





  Send private message  
 
Henrik
PostPosted: Mar 10, 2008 - 12:10 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 12, 2005 - 02:32 AM
Posts: 1968

Status: Offline
Hi Niels,

My guess would be more flight hours and better structure maybe than those FY84 models already retired!!

Greetings,

Henrik.

_________________
Vipers Vorever!!

http://www.flickr.com/photos/49266321@N00/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Roscoe
PostPosted: Mar 10, 2008 - 01:46 AM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jun 29, 2004 - 09:14 PM
Posts: 1279
Location: Las Vegas
Status: Offline
Yup, age is absed on flying hours more than physical age. PLus, those jets may have been bent or damaged such that repair was no longer cost effective. Could be lots of reasons...

_________________
Roscoe

<b>"It's time to get medieval, I'm goin' in for guns"</b> - <i>Dos Gringos</i>
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Mar 10, 2008 - 05:21 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
Thanks guys Very Happy

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scorpion82
PostPosted: Mar 23, 2008 - 08:52 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Oct 07, 2007 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 992

Status: Offline
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the first charlie model flown in 1984? How is it possible that there are FY 83 aircraft?
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
sulfer732
PostPosted: Mar 23, 2008 - 09:04 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Dec 11, 2005 - 09:01 PM
Posts: 157

Status: Offline
well, i know for a fact that it is possible, simply because i work at an AMU where the first ever prduction "D" model is at (83-1174), and the 4th oldest "C" model is at (83-1121). they are both FY83 tails. the aircraft serial is based on the year the aircraft was ordered... not the year that it flew... so you may be correct on the first flight taking place in 1984.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Scorpion82
PostPosted: Mar 24, 2008 - 03:33 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Forum Veteran
Forum Veteran


Joined: Oct 07, 2007 - 07:52 PM
Posts: 992

Status: Offline
sulfer732 wrote:
well, i know for a fact that it is possible, simply because i work at an AMU where the first ever prduction "D" model is at (83-1174), and the 4th oldest "C" model is at (83-1121). they are both FY83 tails. the aircraft serial is based on the year the aircraft was ordered... not the year that it flew... so you may be correct on the first flight taking place in 1984.


That sounds reasonable, thanks.
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Boman
PostPosted: Mar 26, 2008 - 12:56 PM Reply with quote Back to top
Elite 1K
Elite 1K


Joined: Jul 08, 2004 - 08:22 PM
Posts: 1106

Status: Offline
I have wondered about the same thing in the past, and through reading up, the "normal" time from order to actual flight is about 1 1/2 - 2 years.
FY83 then flew in late 1984, early 1985 and so on Very Happy

_________________
Best regards
Niels

http://s587.photobucket.com/albums/ss316/NC-Boman/
 View user's profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:     
Jump to:  
All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Post new topic   Reply to topic
View previous topic Log in to check your private messages View next topic