| Author |
Message |
|
vegasdave901
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2008 - 03:31 AM
|
|
|
Enthusiast

Joined: Dec 31, 2007
Posts: 58
Status: Offline
|
| If so, is it economical when deploying out to Kadena or other parts far beyond? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Sponsor
|
Posted: Oct 13, 2008 - 12:46 AM
|
|
|
F-16.net Sponsor
|
This message from our sponsor will disappear if you log on as a member. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
afaceamongmany
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2008 - 04:12 AM
|
|
|
Newbie

Joined: Mar 05, 2008
Posts: 7
Status: Offline
|
|
vegasdave901 wrote:
If so, is it economical when deploying out to Kadena or other parts far beyond?
Can only go as fast as the tankers that are supporting you. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
akruse21
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2008 - 06:13 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Posts: 746
Status: Offline
|
| What is going on with this thread? |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
MechFromHell
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2008 - 08:25 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Sep 22, 2005
Posts: 300
Status: Offline
|
| It like a conversation of one! |
_________________ Crew Chief
Mountain Home AFB 2000-2005 ~ Acft 91-0370
Sheppard AFB 2005- NOW
www.myspace.com/mechfromhell
|
|
|
|
 |
|
checksixx
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2008 - 02:26 PM
|
|
|
Elite 1K

Joined: Jul 20, 2005
Posts: 1034
Status: Offline
|
| I'm guessing the mods have deleted some of a previous conversation due to the fact that disclosing that information would be a major OPSEC no-no. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Mushmouth
|
Posted: Mar 07, 2008 - 11:51 PM
|
|
|
Active Member

Joined: Jul 11, 2006
Posts: 204
Status: Offline
|
| ????????? |
_________________ '00-'06 Shaw F16CJ/D GE-129
'06-'07 Kunsan F16C/D GE-100
'07-Pres Dyess B1B F101-GE102
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Weasel_Keeper
|
Posted: Mar 09, 2008 - 07:32 AM
|
|
|
Senior member

Joined: Nov 24, 2006
Posts: 278
Status: Offline
|
Should probably delete this entire threat since it makes absolutely no sense anymore.  |
_________________ Cave Putorium!
SoWW #2485
|
|
|
|
 |
|
akruse21
|
Posted: Mar 09, 2008 - 08:27 AM
|
|
|
Forum Veteran

Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Posts: 746
Status: Offline
|
|
Weasel_Keeper wrote:
Should probably delete this entire threat since it makes absolutely no sense anymore.
Just who is this "threat" you speak of and just how are we going to "delete" him/her ?  |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|